GMA X4500MHD vs GeForce2 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1499not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Generation 5.0 (2008)
GPU code nameNV15 A4Cantiga
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 August 2000 (24 years ago)1 September 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data80
Core clock speed250 MHz533 MHz
Number of transistors25 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology180 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data13 Watt
Texture fill rate2.0005.330
Floating-point processing powerno data0.08528 TFLOPS
ROPs41
TMUs810

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 1.0 x16
Length183 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed230 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth7.36 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.010.0
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.22.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2000 1 September 2008
Chip lithography 180 nm 65 nm

GMA X4500MHD has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 Ultra and GMA X4500MHD. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 Ultra is a desktop card while GMA X4500MHD is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra
GeForce2 Ultra
Intel GMA X4500MHD
GMA X4500MHD

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 35 votes

Rate GeForce2 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 12 votes

Rate GMA X4500MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.