Quadro4 980 XGL vs GeForce2 MX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15901566
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameNV11 A2NV28 A2
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 June 2000 (25 years ago)12 November 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed175 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors20 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate0.72.400
ROPs28
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xAGP 8x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount32 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz325 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s10.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.08.1
OpenGL1.21.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce2 MX 2
Samples: 3
Quadro4 980 XGL 5
+150%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2000 12 November 2002
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 180 nm 150 nm

Quadro4 980 XGL has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX and Quadro4 980 XGL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 MX is a desktop graphics card while Quadro4 980 XGL is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce2 MX
GeForce2 MX
NVIDIA Quadro4 980 XGL
Quadro4 980 XGL

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 27 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 102 votes

Rate Quadro4 980 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 MX or Quadro4 980 XGL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.