Radeon RX 9070 XT vs GeForce2 MX + nForce 420

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated31
Place by popularitynot in top-10080
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data63.13
Power efficiencyno data16.25
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameCrush11Navi 48
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 June 2001 (24 years ago)6 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4096
Core clock speed175 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2970 MHz
Number of transistors20 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data304 Watt
Texture fill rate0.7760.3
Floating-point processing powerno data48.66 TFLOPS
ROPs2128
TMUs4256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64
L0 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data8 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data644.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.4
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2001 6 March 2025
Chip lithography 180 nm 4 nm

RX 9070 XT has an age advantage of 23 years, and a 4400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 and Radeon RX 9070 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce2 MX + nForce 420
GeForce2 MX + nForce 420
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
Radeon RX 9070 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce2 MX nForce 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2678 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9070 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 or Radeon RX 9070 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.