Radeon R7 350 640SP vs GeForce2 MX + nForce 420

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameCrush11Cape Verde
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 June 2001 (24 years ago)7 January 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data640
Core clock speed175 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors20 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data55 Watt
Texture fill rate0.737.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.184 TFLOPS
ROPs216
TMUs440
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data72 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2001 7 January 2019
Chip lithography 180 nm 28 nm

R7 350 640SP has an age advantage of 17 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 and Radeon R7 350 640SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce2 MX + nForce 420
GeForce2 MX + nForce 420
AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP
Radeon R7 350 640SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce2 MX nForce 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Radeon R7 350 640SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 or Radeon R7 350 640SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.