Radeon Pro W6600 vs GeForce2 MX + nForce 420

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data25.70
Power efficiencyno data27.57
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameCrush11Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date4 June 2001 (24 years ago)8 June 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1792
Core clock speed175 MHz2331 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2903 MHz
Number of transistors20 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rate0.7325.1
Floating-point processing powerno data10.4 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs4112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2001 8 June 2021
Chip lithography 180 nm 7 nm

Pro W6600 has an age advantage of 20 years, and a 2471% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 and Radeon Pro W6600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro W6600 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce2 MX nForce 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 98 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 or Radeon Pro W6600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.