Radeon Instinct MI350X vs GeForce2 MX + nForce 420

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)CDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameCrush11CDNA Next
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date4 June 2001 (24 years ago)2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16384
Core clock speed175 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors20 million185,000 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data1000 Watt
Texture fill rate0.72,252.8
Floating-point processing powerno data72.09 TFLOPS
ROPs2no data
TMUs41024
Tensor Coresno data1024
L1 Cacheno data4 MB
L2 Cacheno data16 MB
L3 Cacheno data256 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 5.0 x16
WidthIGPOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM3e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared288 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared8192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8.19 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.0N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGL1.2N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 180 nm 3 nm

Instinct MI350X has a 5900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 and Radeon Instinct MI350X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI350X is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce2 MX + nForce 420
GeForce2 MX + nForce 420
AMD Radeon Instinct MI350X
Radeon Instinct MI350X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce2 MX nForce 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI350X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 or Radeon Instinct MI350X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.