Radeon 540X vs GeForce2 MX + nForce 420

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated751
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.77
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameCrush11Lexa
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 June 2001 (24 years ago)5 September 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed175 MHz980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1046 MHz
Number of transistors20 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate0.733.47
Floating-point processing powerno data1.071 TFLOPS
ROPs216
TMUs432
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x8
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data48 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2001 5 September 2018
Chip lithography 180 nm 14 nm

Radeon 540X has an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 and Radeon 540X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 540X is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce2 MX + nForce 420
GeForce2 MX + nForce 420
AMD Radeon 540X
Radeon 540X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce2 MX nForce 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 329 votes

Rate Radeon 540X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 or Radeon 540X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.