UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs GeForce2 MX + nForce 220

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated732
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameCrush11Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 June 2001 (24 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed175 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors20 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology180 nm14 nm
Texture fill rate0.7no data
ROPs2no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xno data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.0DirectX 12_1
OpenGL1.2no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2001 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 180 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs has an age advantage of 19 years, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX + nForce 220 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 MX + nForce 220 is a desktop graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce2 MX + nForce 220
GeForce2 MX + nForce 220
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 1 vote

Rate GeForce2 MX nForce 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 MX + nForce 220 or UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.