GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs GeForce2 MX + nForce 220

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated10
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data54.58
Power efficiencyno data20.17
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameCrush11AD104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 June 2001 (24 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data7680
Core clock speed175 MHz2310 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2610 MHz
Number of transistors20 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data285 Watt
Texture fill rate0.7626.4
Floating-point processing powerno data40.09 TFLOPS
ROPs280
TMUs4240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data285 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1313 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data504.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2001 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 180 nm 4 nm

RTX 4070 Ti has an age advantage of 21 years, and a 4400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX + nForce 220 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce2 MX + nForce 220
GeForce2 MX + nForce 220
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 1 vote

Rate GeForce2 MX nForce 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 7907 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 MX + nForce 220 or GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.