Tesla T10 Processor vs GeForce2 MX 400

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameNV11 B2GT200B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date3 March 2001 (25 years ago)9 April 2009 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data240
Core clock speed200 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors20 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data188 Watt
Texture fill rate0.848.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs480
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s102.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.23.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2001 9 April 2009
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 55 nm

Tesla T10 Processor has an age advantage of 8 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 227% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX 400 and Tesla T10 Processor. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 MX 400 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla T10 Processor is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 143 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 17 votes

Rate Tesla T10 Processor on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 MX 400 or Tesla T10 Processor, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.