FireStream 9250 vs GeForce2 MX 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated840
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.42
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameNV11 B2RV770
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date3 March 2001 (24 years ago)16 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data800
Core clock speed200 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors20 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rate0.825.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1 TFLOPS
ROPs216
TMUs440
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz993 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s63.55 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.010.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL1.23.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2001 16 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 55 nm

FireStream 9250 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 227.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX 400 and FireStream 9250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 MX 400 is a desktop graphics card while FireStream 9250 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400
GeForce2 MX 400
AMD FireStream 9250
FireStream 9250

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 138 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 6 votes

Rate FireStream 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 MX 400 or FireStream 9250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.