CMP 40HX vs GeForce2 MX 400

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated302
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.45
Power efficiencyno data8.68
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV11 B2TU106
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date3 March 2001 (24 years ago)25 February 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed200 MHz1470 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors20 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data185 Watt
Texture fill rate0.8237.6
Floating-point processing powerno data7.603 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs4144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L1 Cacheno data2.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 1.0 x4
Lengthno data229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2001 25 February 2021
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 12 nm

CMP 40HX has an age advantage of 19 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX 400 and CMP 40HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 MX 400 is a desktop graphics card while CMP 40HX is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400
GeForce2 MX 400
NVIDIA CMP 40HX
CMP 40HX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 138 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 70 votes

Rate CMP 40HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 MX 400 or CMP 40HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.