Atari VCS 400 GPU vs GeForce2 MX 400

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNV11 B2Banded Kestrel
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 March 2001 (25 years ago)14 December 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data192
Core clock speed200 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1201 MHz
Number of transistors20 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.814.41
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4612 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xIGP
Lengthno data295 mm
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRDDR4
Maximum RAM amount32 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s38.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2001 14 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 14 nm

Atari VCS 400 GPU has an age advantage of 19 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX 400 and Atari VCS 400 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 142 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atari VCS 400 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 MX 400 or Atari VCS 400 GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.