Radeon Pro V7300X vs GeForce2 MX 200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNV11 B2Ellesmere
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date3 March 2001 (24 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed175 MHz1188 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1243 MHz
Number of transistors20 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data130 Watt
Texture fill rate0.7179.0
ROPs232
TMUs4144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz7 GB/s
Memory bandwidth1.328 GB/s224.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 14 nm

Pro V7300X has a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX 200 and Radeon Pro V7300X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 MX 200 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro V7300X is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200
GeForce2 MX 200
AMD Radeon Pro V7300X
Radeon Pro V7300X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 34 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX 200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V7300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 MX 200 or Radeon Pro V7300X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.