ATI Radeon HD 3200 Mobile IGP vs GeForce2 MX 200 PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameNV11 B2RS780
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date3 March 2001 (24 years ago)1 November 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data40
Core clock speed175 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors20 million180 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm65 nm
Texture fill rate0.72.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.04 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed166 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1.328 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.010.0 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL1.23.3
OpenCLN/A1.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2001 1 November 2009
Chip lithography 180 nm 65 nm

ATI HD 3200 Mobile IGP has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX 200 PCI and Radeon HD 3200 Mobile IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 MX 200 PCI is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 3200 Mobile IGP is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200 PCI
GeForce2 MX 200 PCI
ATI Radeon HD 3200 Mobile IGP
Radeon HD 3200 Mobile IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GeForce2 MX 200 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 10 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3200 Mobile IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 MX 200 PCI or Radeon HD 3200 Mobile IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.