GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs GeForce2 MX 200 LP
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 63 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 93 |
| Value for money | no data | 46.49 |
| Architecture | Celsius (1999−2005) | Turing (2018−2021) |
| GPU code name | NV11 B3 | Turing TU104 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 3 March 2001 (23 years ago) | 2 July 2019 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $499 |
| Current price | no data | $261 (0.5x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 175 MHz | 1605 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1770 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 20 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 180 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 215 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 0.7 | 283.2 |
Size and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | AGP 4x | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | SDR | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 166 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 1.328 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x VGA | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| HDMI | no data | + |
| G-SYNC support | no data | + |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | no data | + |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 7.0 | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | no data | 7.5 |
Advantages and disadvantages
| Recency | 3 March 2001 | 2 July 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 12 nm |
We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX 200 LP and GeForce RTX 2070 Super. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
