Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU vs GeForce2 MX 200 LP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)no data
GPU code nameNV11 B3no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date3 March 2001 (24 years ago)30 October 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data40
Core clock speed175 MHzno data
Number of transistors20 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology180 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
Texture fill rate0.7no data
ROPs2no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 4xno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRLPDDR5x-8533
Maximum RAM amount32 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed166 MHz8533 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.328 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.0no data
OpenGL1.2no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2001 30 October 2024
Chip lithography 180 nm 3 nm

Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU has an age advantage of 23 years, and a 5900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX 200 LP and M4 Max 40-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 MX 200 LP is a desktop graphics card while Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200 LP
GeForce2 MX 200 LP
Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU
M4 Max 40-Core GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 7 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX 200 LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 35 votes

Rate M4 Max 40-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 MX 200 LP or M4 Max 40-Core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.