Arc Graphics 32EU vs GeForce RTX 5070
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 19 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 48 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 60.21 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 20.65 | no data |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 (2025) | Xe2-LPG (2024−2025) |
| GPU code name | GB205 | Arrow Lake |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 4 March 2025 (less than a year ago) | 24 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 6144 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 2325 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2512 MHz | 1950 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 31,100 million | 17,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 482.3 | 31.20 |
| Floating-point processing power | 30.87 TFLOPS | 0.9984 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 80 | 8 |
| TMUs | 192 | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 192 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | Ring Bus |
| Length | 245 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR7 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 672.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | Motherboard Dependent |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 10.1 | - |
| DLSS | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 March 2025 | 24 October 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 65 Watt |
RTX 5070 has an age advantage of 4 months.
Arc Graphics 32EU, on the other hand, has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 284.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 5070 and Arc Graphics 32EU. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
