Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile vs GeForce RTX 4090 Ti

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularity67not in top-100
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameAD102Tiger Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2023 (1 year ago)2 September 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores18176384
Core clock speed2325 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2565 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors76,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)600 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate1,45726.40
Floating-point processing power93.24 TFLOPS0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPs19212
TMUs56824
Tensor Cores568no data
Ray Tracing Cores142no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16Ring Bus
Length336 mmno data
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount24 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1.15 TB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 600 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 4090 Ti has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile, on the other hand, has 3900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4090 Ti and Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4090 Ti is a desktop card while Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile
Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 3304 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 59 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.