Apple M4 32-core GPU vs GeForce RTX 4090 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularity66not in top-100
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)no data
GPU code nameAD102no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2023 (1 year ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1817632
Core clock speed2325 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2565 MHzno data
Number of transistors76,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)600 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate1,457no data
Floating-point processing power93.24 TFLOPSno data
ROPs192no data
TMUs568no data
Tensor Cores568no data
Ray Tracing Cores142no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length336 mmno data
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XLPDDR5x-8533
Maximum RAM amount24 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1500 MHz8533 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.15 TB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4ano data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.9-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 600 Watt 45 Watt

Apple M4 32-core GPU has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4090 Ti and Apple M4 32-core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4090 Ti is a desktop card while Apple M4 32-core GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
GeForce RTX 4090 Ti
Apple M4 32-core GPU
M4 32-core GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 3294 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 32-core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.