Arc Pro A60M vs GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking38not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency39.88no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameAD104DG2-256
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)6 June 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores74242048
Core clock speed1290 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1665 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors35,800 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate386.3166.4
Floating-point processing power24.72 TFLOPS5.325 TFLOPS
ROPs8064
TMUs232128
Tensor Cores232256
Ray Tracing Cores5816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 6 June 2023
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 4 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 95 Watt

RTX 4080 Mobile has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

Arc Pro A60M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 15.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile and Arc Pro A60M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Arc Pro A60M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4080
Intel Arc Pro A60M
Arc Pro A60M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 778 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 22 votes

Rate Arc Pro A60M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile or Arc Pro A60M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.