ROG Ally GPU vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9not rated
Place by popularity12not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation67.41no data
Power efficiency24.80no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameAD104Phoenix
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7168256
Core clock speed1980 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed2475 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors35,800 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate554.440.00
Floating-point processing power35.48 TFLOPS2.56 TFLOPS
ROPs808
TMUs22416
Tensor Cores224no data
Ray Tracing Cores564

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length267 mm280 mm
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XLPDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1313 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth504.2 GB/s51.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 30 Watt

ROG Ally GPU has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 633.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and ROG Ally GPU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
AMD ROG Ally GPU
ROG Ally GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3599 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate ROG Ally GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.