GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost vs RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	34	not rated
Place by popularity	92	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	63.84	no data
Power efficiency	24.85	no data
Architecture	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)	no data
GPU code name	AD106	no data
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	18 May 2023 (1 year ago)	3 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4352	24
Core clock speed	2310 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2535 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	22,900 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	344.8	no data
Floating-point processing power	22.06 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	48	no data
TMUs	136	no data
Tensor Cores	136	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	34	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	no data
Length	240 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	no data
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	no data
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	10
Shader Model	6.7	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	3.0	no data
Vulkan	1.3	-
CUDA	8.9	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	18 May 2023	3 June 2008
Chip lithography	5 nm	65 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---