Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 vs GeForce RTX 4050

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking122not rated
Place by popularity41not in top-100
Power efficiency26.02no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameAD107NV43
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2023 (1 year ago)14 February 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed2505 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed2640 MHzno data
Number of transistors18,900 million146 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate211.22.000
Floating-point processing power13.52 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs808
Tensor Cores120no data
Ray Tracing Cores18no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data187 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB128 MB
Memory bus width96 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth216.0 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a2x DMS-59
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.73.0
OpenGL4.62.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.9-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 5 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 31 Watt

RTX 4050 has a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2100% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 440 PCIe x16, on the other hand, has 222.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4050 and Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4050 is a desktop card while Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
GeForce RTX 4050
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16
Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1943 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.