Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile vs GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking124not rated
Place by popularity54not in top-100
Power efficiency51.50no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameAD107Lucienne
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560512
Core clock speed1455 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1755 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate140.460.80
Floating-point processing power8.986 TFLOPS1.946 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs8032
Tensor Cores80no data
Ray Tracing Cores20no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width96 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed16000 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 12 January 2021
Chip lithography 4 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 25 Watt

RTX 4050 Mobile has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

Graphics 512SP Mobile, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
AMD Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 2787 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 50 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.