Riva TNT2 vs GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1582
Place by popularity72not in top-100
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code nameAD107NV5
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)12 October 1999 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed1140 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed1605 MHzno data
Number of transistors18,900 million15 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate128.40.25
Floating-point processing power8.218 TFLOPSno data
ROPs482
TMUs802
Tensor Cores80no data
Ray Tracing Cores20no data
L1 Cache2.5 MBno data
L2 Cache12 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6SDR
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 MB
Memory bus width96 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz150 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s2.4 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)6.0
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 12 October 1999
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 5 nm 250 nm

RTX 4050 Max-Q has an age advantage of 23 years, a 38300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q and Riva TNT2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q is a notebook graphics card while Riva TNT2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q
NVIDIA Riva TNT2
Riva TNT2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 111 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 29 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q or Riva TNT2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.