Radeon X300 vs GeForce RTX 3090

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking19not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.49no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)Rage 9 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameAmpere GA102RV370
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date24 September 2020 (3 years ago)1 September 2004 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data
Current price$1198 (0.8x MSRP)$62

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10496no data
Core clock speed1400 MHz375 MHz
Boost clock speed1700 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt36 Watt
Texture fill rate556.01.500

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length313 mmno data
Width3-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XDDR
Maximum RAM amount24 GB64 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed19500 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth936.2 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.5no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 September 2020 1 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 36 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3090 and Radeon X300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GeForce RTX 3090
ATI Radeon X300
Radeon X300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 78441 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 28 votes

Rate Radeon X300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.