Radeon Pro V320 vs GeForce RTX 3090
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 23 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 22.40 | no data |
| Architecture | Ampere (2020−2024) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | Ampere GA102 | Vega 10 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 24 September 2020 (3 years ago) | 29 June 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 10496 | 3584 |
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 852 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 28,300 million | 12,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 556.0 | 336.0 |
| Floating-point performance | 35.58 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 313 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 3-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6X | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 19500 MHz | 1890 MBps |
| Memory bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
| HDMI | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 8.5 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 24 September 2020 | 29 June 2017 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 230 Watt |
RTX 3090 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.
Pro V320, on the other hand, has 52.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3090 and Radeon Pro V320. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 3090 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro V320 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
