ATI Radeon HD 4700 vs GeForce RTX 3090

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking24not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.89no data
Power efficiency13.70no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGA102RV730
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)11 February 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10496320
Core clock speed1395 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1695 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate556.019.20
Floating-point processing power35.58 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs1128
TMUs32832
Tensor Cores328no data
Ray Tracing Cores82no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length336 mm193 mm
Width3-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XDDR2
Maximum RAM amount24 GB512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1219 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth936.2 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.54.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2020 11 February 2010
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 3090 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 587.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 4700, on the other hand, has 600% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3090 and Radeon HD 4700. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GeForce RTX 3090
ATI Radeon HD 4700
Radeon HD 4700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 78971 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 20 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.