ATI Graphics Pro Turbo vs GeForce RTX 3090

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking24not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.89no data
Power efficiency13.70no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameGA102Mach64
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)1995 (29 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10496no data
Core clock speed1395 MHz40 MHz
Boost clock speed1695 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm600 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Wattno data
Texture fill rate556.0no data
Floating-point processing power35.58 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1121
TMUs328no data
Tensor Cores328no data
Ray Tracing Cores82no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCI
Length336 mmno data
Width3-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XVRAM
Maximum RAM amount24 GB2 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1219 MHz40 MHz
Memory bandwidth936.2 GB/s320.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x VGA
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.5-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 2 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 600 nm

RTX 3090 has a 1228700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 7400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3090 and Graphics Pro Turbo. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GeForce RTX 3090
ATI Graphics Pro Turbo
Graphics Pro Turbo

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 78971 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 17 votes

Rate Graphics Pro Turbo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.