GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs RTX A4500 Laptop GPU

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 1119$
Games supported 100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 1560
  • Max video memory 24 GB
  • Memory type GDDR6X
  • Memory clock speed 21000
  • Maximum resolution
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Laptop GPU
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Laptop GPU
Buy
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory 16 GB
  • Memory type GDDR6
  • Memory clock speed 16000
  • Maximum resolution
Price now no data
Games supported 100%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating341
Place by popularity26no data
Value for money22.79no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameAmpere GA102GA104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date27 January 2022 (less than a year ago)30 March 2022 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999 no data
Current price$1119 (0.6x MSRP)no data
Value for money

To calculate the index we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores107525888
Core clock speed1560 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1860 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm8 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)450 Watt140 Watt (80 - 140 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate625.0no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on GeForce RTX 3090 Ti and RTX A4500 Laptop GPU compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length336 mmno data
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinno data

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed21000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,008 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4ano data
HDMI+no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3no data
CUDA8.6no data

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3090 Ti 75.83
+63.4%
RTX A4500 Laptop GPU 46.40
  • Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 26%

RTX 3090 Ti 29670
+63.4%
RTX A4500 Laptop GPU 18157

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD211no data
1440p142no data
4K100no data

Popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 219
+181%
75−80
−181%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−110
+39%
75−80
−39%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 160
+105%
75−80
−105%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+30.7%
120−130
−30.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 170−180
+39.4%
120−130
−39.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 201
+158%
75−80
−158%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+43.6%
110−120
−43.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+26%
100−105
−26%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+46.4%
130−140
−46.4%
Hitman 3 210−220
+42.6%
140−150
−42.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+72.9%
95−100
−72.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130−140
+73.3%
75−80
−73.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 265
+137%
110−120
−137%
Watch Dogs: Legion 171
+109%
80−85
−109%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−110
+39%
75−80
−39%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 138
+76.9%
75−80
−76.9%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+30.7%
120−130
−30.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 170−180
+39.4%
120−130
−39.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 173
+122%
75−80
−122%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+43.6%
110−120
−43.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+26%
100−105
−26%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+46.4%
130−140
−46.4%
Hitman 3 210−220
+42.6%
140−150
−42.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+72.9%
95−100
−72.9%
Metro Exodus 178
+114%
80−85
−114%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130−140
+73.3%
75−80
−73.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 251
+124%
110−120
−124%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 394
+237%
110−120
−237%
Watch Dogs: Legion 154
+87.8%
80−85
−87.8%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−110
+39%
75−80
−39%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 123
+57.7%
75−80
−57.7%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+30.7%
120−130
−30.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 152
+94.9%
75−80
−94.9%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+43.6%
110−120
−43.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+26%
100−105
−26%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+46.4%
130−140
−46.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 193
+65%
110−120
−65%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130
+58.5%
80−85
−58.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 140−150
+77.2%
75−80
−77.2%
Hitman 3 170−180
+92.2%
90−95
−92.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+102%
60−65
−102%
Metro Exodus 125
+145%
50−55
−145%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+105%
35−40
−105%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 184
+156%
70−75
−156%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+62%
50−55
−62%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 108
+112%
50−55
−112%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+55.3%
90−95
−55.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 104
+167%
35−40
−167%
Far Cry 5 140−150
+64.7%
85−90
−64.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+39%
80−85
−39%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+75.2%
100−110
−75.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 108
+157%
40−45
−157%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+95.6%
45−50
−95.6%
Hitman 3 100−110
+117%
45−50
−117%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+123%
35−40
−123%
Metro Exodus 84
+163%
30−35
−163%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+108%
24−27
−108%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 106
+179%
35−40
−179%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 173
+209%
55−60
−209%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+78.8%
30−35
−78.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 73
+143%
30−33
−143%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+82.5%
55−60
−82.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 53
+212%
16−18
−212%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+95.7%
45−50
−95.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+82%
50−55
−82%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+98.5%
65−70
−98.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70
+204%
21−24
−204%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 75.83 46.40
Recency 27 January 2022 30 March 2022
Memory bus width 384 256
Pipelines / CUDA cores 10752 5888
Thermal design power (TDP) 450 Watt 140 Watt

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

since it shows better performance.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is a desktop card while RTX A4500 Laptop GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of GeForce RTX 3090 Ti by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce RTX 3090 Ti from AMD is Radeon RX 6950 XT, which is slower by 3% and lower by 1 position in our rating.

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT Radeon RX 6950 XT
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 3090 Ti:

Competitors of RTX A4500 Laptop GPU by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to RTX A4500 Laptop GPU from AMD is Radeon RX 6800S, which is slower by 19% and lower by 28 positions in our rating.

AMD Radeon RX 6800S Radeon RX 6800S
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to RTX A4500 Laptop GPU:

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1889 ratings

Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 rating

Rate NVIDIA RTX A4500 Laptop GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.