Playstation 4 Slim GPU vs GeForce RTX 3080

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking23not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.49no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameAmpere GA102Liverpool 16nm
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date16 September 2020 (3 years ago)7 September 2016 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $399
Current price$823 (1.2x MSRP)$38 (0.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores87041152
Core clock speed1450 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1710 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate465.157.60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length285 mm288 mm
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount10 GB8 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed19000 MHz5.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth760.3 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1*
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.21.1
CUDA8.5no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 September 2020 7 September 2016
Cost $699 $399
Maximum RAM amount 10 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 75 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3080 and Playstation 4 Slim GPU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080
AMD Playstation 4 Slim GPU
Playstation 4 Slim GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5103 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 107 votes

Rate Playstation 4 Slim GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.