ATI Radeon 9200 SE vs GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking251546
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation22.72no data
Power efficiency13.67no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGA102RV280
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date31 May 2021 (3 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10240no data
Core clock speed1365 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1665 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate532.80.8
Floating-point processing power34.1 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1124
TMUs3204
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores80no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 8x
Length285 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XDDR
Maximum RAM amount12 GB64 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1188 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth912.4 GB/s2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)8.1
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3080 Ti 26983
+1349050%
ATI 9200 SE 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD215no data
1440p144no data
4K96no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.58no data
1440p8.33no data
4K12.49no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 200−210 no data
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 219 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 200−210 no data
Battlefield 5 170−180 no data
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 184 no data
Far Cry 5 208 no data
Fortnite 300−350 no data
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 no data
Forza Horizon 5 200 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 350−400 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 200−210 no data
Battlefield 5 170−180 no data
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 160 no data
Dota 2 234 no data
Far Cry 5 198 no data
Fortnite 300−350 no data
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 no data
Forza Horizon 5 188 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 174 no data
Metro Exodus 172 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 372 no data
Valorant 350−400 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 196 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 146 no data
Dota 2 217 no data
Far Cry 5 186 no data
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 181 no data
Valorant 388 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 300−350 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 190−200 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 153 no data
Metro Exodus 114 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 400−450 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 192 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 99 no data
Far Cry 5 176 no data
Forza Horizon 4 220−230 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160 no data

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 60−65 no data
Counter-Strike 2 85−90 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 182 no data
Metro Exodus 76 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 152 no data
Valorant 300−350 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 136 no data
Counter-Strike 2 85−90 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50 no data
Dota 2 211 no data
Far Cry 5 109 no data
Forza Horizon 4 170−180 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2021 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 28 Watt

RTX 3080 Ti has an age advantage of 18 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 SE, on the other hand, has 1150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and Radeon 9200 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
ATI Radeon 9200 SE
Radeon 9200 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 11311 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 69 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3080 Ti or Radeon 9200 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.