ATI Radeon 7200 vs GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking361594
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation27.58no data
Power efficiency14.04no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGA102R100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date31 May 2021 (4 years ago)1 April 2000 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10240no data
Core clock speed1365 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed1665 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate532.81
Floating-point processing power34.1 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1122
TMUs3206
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores80no data
L1 Cache10 MBno data
L2 Cache6 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 4x
Length285 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XDDR
Maximum RAM amount12 GB32 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1188 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth912.4 GB/s5.312 GB/s
Shared memory-no data
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x VGA
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)7.0
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3080 Ti 26874
+1343600%
Samples: 13904
ATI 7200 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD215no data
1440p144no data
4K96no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.58no data
1440p8.33no data
4K12.49no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 219 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 150−160 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 170−180 no data
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 184 no data
Far Cry 5 208 no data
Fortnite 300−350 no data
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 no data
Forza Horizon 5 200 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 150−160 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 350−400 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 170−180 no data
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 160 no data
Dota 2 234 no data
Far Cry 5 198 no data
Fortnite 300−350 no data
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 no data
Forza Horizon 5 188 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 174 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 150−160 no data
Metro Exodus 172 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 372 no data
Valorant 350−400 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 196 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 146 no data
Dota 2 217 no data
Far Cry 5 186 no data
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 150−160 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 181 no data
Valorant 388 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 190−200 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 153 no data
Metro Exodus 114 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 450−500 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 192 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 99 no data
Far Cry 5 176 no data
Forza Horizon 4 220−230 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 85−90 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 182 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 76 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 152 no data
Valorant 300−350 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 136 no data
Counter-Strike 2 85−90 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50 no data
Dota 2 211 no data
Far Cry 5 109 no data
Forza Horizon 4 170−180 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2021 1 April 2000
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 23 Watt

RTX 3080 Ti has an age advantage of 21 years, a 38300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7200, on the other hand, has 1421.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and Radeon 7200. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
ATI Radeon 7200
Radeon 7200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 12183 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 24 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3080 Ti or Radeon 7200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.