Radeon PRO W7700 vs GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated52
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data31.22
Power efficiencyno data22.16
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameGA103SNavi 32
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date25 January 2022 (4 years ago)13 November 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores74243072
Core clock speed585 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate261.0499.2
Floating-point processing power16.7 TFLOPS31.95 TFLOPS
ROPs9696
TMUs232192
Tensor Cores232no data
Ray Tracing Cores5848
L0 Cacheno data768 KB
L1 Cache7.3 MB768 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 January 2022 13 November 2023
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 190 Watt

RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q has 138% lower power consumption.

PRO W7700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q and Radeon PRO W7700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q is a notebook graphics card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 12 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 12 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q or Radeon PRO W7700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.