Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano vs GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking164not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.94no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGA104Vega 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 January 2021 (4 years ago)1 October 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51204096
Core clock speed1110 MHz1156 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1247 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate249.6319.2
Floating-point processing power15.97 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8064
TMUs160256
Tensor Cores160no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data
L1 Cache5 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data152 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s409.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12.0
Shader Model6.55.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2-
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 January 2021 1 October 2017
Chip lithography 8 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 250 Watt

RTX 3070 Mobile has an age advantage of 3 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2183 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile or Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.