Radeon Pro W6800X Duo vs GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Place in the ranking	127	104
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	6.73
Power efficiency	22.42	6.98
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GA104	Navi 21
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	12 January 2021 (4 years ago)	3 August 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$4,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5120	3840
Core clock speed	1110 MHz	1800 MHz
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz	1967 MHz
Number of transistors	17,400 million	26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	125 Watt	400 Watt
Texture fill rate	249.6	472.1
Floating-point processing power	15.97 TFLOPS	15.11 TFLOPS
ROPs	80	96
TMUs	160	240
Tensor Cores	160	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	40	60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	Apple MPX
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	Quad-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	8.6	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3070 Mobile 37.36

Pro W6800X Duo 40.46
+8.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3070 Mobile 14364

Pro W6800X Duo 15556
+8.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	115 −4.3%	120−130 +4.3%
1440p	71 −5.6%	75−80 +5.6%
4K	46 +2.2%	45−50 −2.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	41.66
1440p	no data	66.65
4K	no data	111.09

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	122 −6.6%	130−140 +6.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	119 −0.8%	120−130 +0.8%
Elden Ring	125 −4%	130−140 +4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 +1%	100−105 −1%
Counter-Strike 2	102 −7.8%	110−120 +7.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	97 −3.1%	100−105 +3.1%
Forza Horizon 4	224 −7.1%	240−250 +7.1%
Metro Exodus	112 −7.1%	120−130 +7.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 −8.1%	80−85 +8.1%
Valorant	140−150 −7.4%	160−170 +7.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 +1%	100−105 −1%
Counter-Strike 2	85 −5.9%	90−95 +5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	80 −6.3%	85−90 +6.3%
Dota 2	127 −2.4%	130−140 +2.4%
Elden Ring	181 −5%	190−200 +5%
Far Cry 5	79 −7.6%	85−90 +7.6%
Fortnite	160−170 −2.4%	170−180 +2.4%
Forza Horizon 4	183 −3.8%	190−200 +3.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	125 −4%	130−140 +4%
Metro Exodus	91 −4.4%	95−100 +4.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 −7.1%	210−220 +7.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	66 −6.1%	70−75 +6.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	130−140 −6.9%	140−150 +6.9%
Valorant	98 −2%	100−105 +2%
World of Tanks	270−280 −7.5%	300−310 +7.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 +1%	100−105 −1%
Counter-Strike 2	85 −5.9%	90−95 +5.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	68 −2.9%	70−75 +2.9%
Dota 2	120 +0%	120−130 +0%
Far Cry 5	95−100 −5.3%	100−105 +5.3%
Forza Horizon 4	168 −7.1%	180−190 +7.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 −7.1%	210−220 +7.1%
Valorant	183 −3.8%	190−200 +3.8%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	83 −2.4%	85−90 +2.4%
Elden Ring	103 −6.8%	110−120 +6.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	83 −2.4%	85−90 +2.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −2.9%	180−190 +2.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	38 −5.3%	40−45 +5.3%
World of Tanks	230−240 −5.5%	250−260 +5.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 −7.1%	75−80 +7.1%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −8.1%	40−45 +8.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	43 −4.7%	45−50 +4.7%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	125 −4%	130−140 +4%
Metro Exodus	91 −4.4%	95−100 +4.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 −1.6%	65−70 +1.6%
Valorant	118 −1.7%	120−130 +1.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −5.3%	40−45 +5.3%
Dota 2	83 −2.4%	85−90 +2.4%
Elden Ring	51 −7.8%	55−60 +7.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	83 −2.4%	85−90 +2.4%
Metro Exodus	37 −8.1%	40−45 +8.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24 +0%	24−27 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	83 −2.4%	85−90 +2.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −4.7%	45−50 +4.7%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −5.3%	40−45 +5.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	20 −5%	21−24 +5%
Dota 2	109 −0.9%	110−120 +0.9%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −1.9%	55−60 +1.9%
Fortnite	50−55 −5.8%	55−60 +5.8%
Forza Horizon 4	71 −5.6%	75−80 +5.6%
Valorant	64 −1.6%	65−70 +1.6%

This is how RTX 3070 Mobile and Pro W6800X Duo compete in popular games:

Pro W6800X Duo is 4% faster in 1080p
Pro W6800X Duo is 6% faster in 1440p
RTX 3070 Mobile is 2% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	37.36	40.46
Recency	12 January 2021	3 August 2021
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	32 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	125 Watt	400 Watt

RTX 3070 Mobile has 220% lower power consumption.

Pro W6800X Duo, on the other hand, has a 8.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and Radeon Pro W6800X Duo.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.