FirePro D300 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated505
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data4.75
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGA104Pitcairn
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date12 January 2021 (4 years ago)18 January 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51201280
Core clock speed780 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1290 MHzno data
Number of transistors17,400 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate206.468.00
Floating-point processing power13.21 TFLOPS2.176 TFLOPS
ROPs8032
TMUs16080
Tensor Cores160no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data
L1 Cache5 MB320 KB
L2 Cache4 MB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1270 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s162.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.21.2.131
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 January 2021 18 January 2014
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 150 Watt

RTX 3070 Max-Q has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 87.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q and FirePro D300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q is a notebook graphics card while FirePro D300 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
AMD FirePro D300
FirePro D300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 169 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 35 votes

Rate FirePro D300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q or FirePro D300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.