Radeon E9175 PCIe vs GeForce RTX 3060

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking83not rated
Place by popularity4not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation70.91no data
Power efficiency17.88no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGA106Lexa
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)3 October 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584512
Core clock speed1320 MHz1124 MHz
Boost clock speed1777 MHz1219 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate199.039.01
Floating-point processing power12.74 TFLOPS1.248 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs11232
Tensor Cores112no data
Ray Tracing Cores28no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1875 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth360.0 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a5x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 January 2021 3 October 2017
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 3060 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

E9175 PCIe, on the other hand, has 240% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon E9175 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3060 is a desktop card while Radeon E9175 PCIe is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
AMD Radeon E9175 PCIe
Radeon E9175 PCIe

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 28719 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon E9175 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.