Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB vs GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Place in the ranking	170	54
Place by popularity	69	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	88.00
Power efficiency	28.15	14.14
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GA106	Navi 22
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	12 January 2021 (4 years ago)	17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$334

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	2560
Core clock speed	900 MHz	2321 MHz
Boost clock speed	1425 MHz	2581 MHz
Number of transistors	13,250 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	171.0	413.0
Floating-point processing power	10.94 TFLOPS	13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	64
TMUs	120	160
Tensor Cores	120	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	30	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	336.0 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	8.6	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3060 Mobile 32.65

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB 51.27
+57%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3060 Mobile 12550

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB 19705
+57%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	99 −51.5%	150−160 +51.5%
1440p	65 −53.8%	100−110 +53.8%
4K	42 −54.8%	65−70 +54.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.23
1440p	no data	3.34
4K	no data	5.14

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	65−70 −53.8%	100−105 +53.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	103 −55.3%	160−170 +55.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −50.5%	140−150 +50.5%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 −53.8%	100−105 +53.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	81 −48.1%	120−130 +48.1%
Forza Horizon 4	195 −53.8%	300−310 +53.8%
Forza Horizon 5	115 −56.5%	180−190 +56.5%
Metro Exodus	94 −48.9%	140−150 +48.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −49.3%	100−105 +49.3%
Valorant	130−140 −53.8%	200−210 +53.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −50.5%	140−150 +50.5%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 −53.8%	100−105 +53.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	67 −49.3%	100−105 +49.3%
Dota 2	124 −53.2%	190−200 +53.2%
Far Cry 5	80 −50%	120−130 +50%
Fortnite	150−160 −52.3%	230−240 +52.3%
Forza Horizon 4	158 −51.9%	240−250 +51.9%
Forza Horizon 5	99 −51.5%	150−160 +51.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	121 −57%	190−200 +57%
Metro Exodus	78 −53.8%	120−130 +53.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 −52.2%	280−290 +52.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	56 −51.8%	85−90 +51.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 −53.2%	170−180 +53.2%
Valorant	101 −48.5%	150−160 +48.5%
World of Tanks	270−280 −44.4%	400−450 +44.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −50.5%	140−150 +50.5%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 −53.8%	100−105 +53.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	59 −52.5%	90−95 +52.5%
Dota 2	124 −53.2%	190−200 +53.2%
Far Cry 5	85−90 −46.1%	130−140 +46.1%
Forza Horizon 4	140 −50%	210−220 +50%
Forza Horizon 5	81 −48.1%	120−130 +48.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 −52.2%	280−290 +52.2%
Valorant	172 −57%	270−280 +57%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	75 −46.7%	110−120 +46.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	75 −46.7%	110−120 +46.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −54.3%	270−280 +54.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40 −50%	60−65 +50%
World of Tanks	210−220 −42.9%	300−310 +42.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −50.8%	95−100 +50.8%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −56.3%	50−55 +56.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	37 −48.6%	55−60 +48.6%
Far Cry 5	121 −57%	190−200 +57%
Forza Horizon 4	101 −48.5%	150−160 +48.5%
Forza Horizon 5	63 −50.8%	95−100 +50.8%
Metro Exodus	85 −52.9%	130−140 +52.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −50.9%	80−85 +50.9%
Valorant	141 −56%	220−230 +56%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −56.3%	50−55 +56.3%
Dota 2	73 −50.7%	110−120 +50.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	73 −50.7%	110−120 +50.7%
Metro Exodus	31 −45.2%	45−50 +45.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 −55.3%	160−170 +55.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	22 −36.4%	30−33 +36.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	73 −50.7%	110−120 +50.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −52.8%	55−60 +52.8%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −56.3%	50−55 +56.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	16 −50%	24−27 +50%
Dota 2	95 −47.4%	140−150 +47.4%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −52.2%	70−75 +52.2%
Fortnite	40−45 −51.2%	65−70 +51.2%
Forza Horizon 4	60 −50%	90−95 +50%
Forza Horizon 5	34 −47.1%	50−55 +47.1%
Valorant	62 −53.2%	95−100 +53.2%

This is how RTX 3060 Mobile and RX 6750 GRE 12 GB compete in popular games:

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 52% faster in 1080p
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 54% faster in 1440p
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 55% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	32.65	51.27
Recency	12 January 2021	17 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	250 Watt

RTX 3060 Mobile has 212.5% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, on the other hand, has a 57% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.