Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB vs GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile with Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3060 Mobile
2021
6 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
30.12
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
2023, $309
10 GB GDDR6, 170 Watt
45.47
+51%

6750 GRE 10 GB outperforms RTX 3060 Mobile by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking21791
Place by popularity74not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data88.81
Power efficiency29.1920.73
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGA106Navi 22
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 January 2021 (5 years ago)17 October 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$309

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38402304
Core clock speed900 MHz1941 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz2450 MHz
Number of transistors13,250 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rate171.0352.8
Floating-point processing power10.94 TFLOPS11.29 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs120144
Tensor Cores120no data
Ray Tracing Cores3036
L0 Cacheno data576 KB
L1 Cache3.8 MB512 KB
L2 Cache3 MB3 MB
L3 Cacheno data80 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB10 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s320.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.21.4
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 3060 Mobile 30.12
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB 45.47
+51%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3060 Mobile 12550
Samples: 22028
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB 18941
+50.9%
Samples: 40

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD92
−29.2%
130−140
1440p6090−95
+50%
4K3855−60
+44.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.38
1440pno data3.43
4Kno data5.62

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 174 260−270
+49.4%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180 250−260
+46.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 103 150−160
+45.6%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 124 180−190
+45.2%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 131 190−200
+45%
Battlefield 5 110−120 170−180
+49.1%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180 250−260
+46.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 86 120−130
+39.5%
Far Cry 5 112 160−170
+42.9%
Fortnite 140−150 210−220
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120 170−180
+42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130 180−190
+46.3%
Valorant 190−200 290−300
+48.7%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 75 110−120
+46.7%
Battlefield 5 141 210−220
+48.9%
Counter-Strike 2 61 90−95
+47.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 400−450
+45.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 69 100−105
+44.9%
Dota 2 131 190−200
+45%
Far Cry 5 106 160−170
+50.9%
Fortnite 140−150 210−220
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120 170−180
+42.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 121 180−190
+48.8%
Metro Exodus 81 120−130
+48.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130 180−190
+46.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142 210−220
+47.9%
Valorant 189 280−290
+48.1%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 131 190−200
+45%
Cyberpunk 2077 62 90−95
+45.2%
Dota 2 124 180−190
+45.2%
Far Cry 5 101 150−160
+48.5%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120 170−180
+42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130 180−190
+46.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 78 110−120
+41%
Valorant 172 250−260
+45.3%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150 210−220
+50%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 82 120−130
+46.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220 300−310
+40.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 75 110−120
+46.7%
Metro Exodus 50 75−80
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 260−270
+48.6%
Valorant 304 450−500
+48%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 104 150−160
+44.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 39 55−60
+41%
Far Cry 5 84 120−130
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85 120−130
+46.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55 80−85
+50.9%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 110−120
+42.9%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 24−27 35−40
+45.8%
Counter-Strike 2 25 35−40
+40%
Grand Theft Auto V 73 110−120
+50.7%
Metro Exodus 31 45−50
+45.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55 80−85
+45.5%
Valorant 180−190 270−280
+49.2%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 63 95−100
+50.8%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35 45−50
+36.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 15 21−24
+40%
Dota 2 95 140−150
+47.4%
Far Cry 5 40 60−65
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 80−85
+45.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 50−55
+38.9%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 35−40 50−55
+38.9%

This is how RTX 3060 Mobile and RX 6750 GRE 10 GB compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is 41% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is 50% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is 45% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.12 45.47
Recency 12 January 2021 17 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 170 Watt

RTX 3060 Mobile has 53% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 GRE 10 GB, on the other hand, has a 51% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 67% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 13% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 6317 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 121 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile or Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.