ATI Mobility Radeon X200 IGP vs GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking214not rated
Place by popularity96not in top-100
Power efficiency28.67no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameGA106RS400
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 January 2021 (4 years ago)2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840no data
Core clock speed900 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,250 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Wattno data
Texture fill rate171.00.6
Floating-point processing power10.94 TFLOPSno data
ROPs482
TMUs1202
Tensor Cores120no data
Ray Tracing Cores30no data
L1 Cache3.8 MBno data
L2 Cache3 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 8 nm 130 nm

RTX 3060 Mobile has a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile and Mobility Radeon X200 IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Mobility Radeon X200 IGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
ATI Mobility Radeon X200 IGP
Mobility Radeon X200 IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 5537 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 11 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon X200 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile or Mobility Radeon X200 IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.