Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking49not rated
Place by popularity27not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation71.06no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGA104TU102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 December 2020 (3 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $9,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48644608
Core clock speed1410 MHz1230 MHz
Boost clock speed1665 MHz1620 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate253.1466.6
Floating-point processing power16.2 TFLOPS14.93 TFLOPS
ROPs8096
TMUs152288
Tensor Cores152576
Ray Tracing Cores3872

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length242 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.21.2.131
CUDA8.67.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2020 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 260 Watt

RTX 3060 Ti has an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 30% lower power consumption.

RTX 8000 Passive, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro RTX 8000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a desktop card while Quadro RTX 8000 Passive is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 14767 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 20 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.