ATI FireGL V7350 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking48not rated
Place by popularity21not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation70.84no data
Power efficiency19.51no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameGA104R520
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 December 2020 (3 years ago)1 October 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4864no data
Core clock speed1410 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1665 MHzno data
Number of transistors17,400 million321 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt111 Watt
Texture fill rate253.19.600
Floating-point processing power16.2 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8016
TMUs15216
Tensor Cores152no data
Ray Tracing Cores38no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length242 mm229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz650 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s41.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.53.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2020 1 October 2005
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 111 Watt

RTX 3060 Ti has an age advantage of 15 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireGL V7350, on the other hand, has 80.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and FireGL V7350. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a desktop card while FireGL V7350 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
ATI FireGL V7350
FireGL V7350

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 14807 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate FireGL V7350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.