Radeon R7 350 Fake Card vs GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking233not rated
Place by popularity45not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameAmpere GA106Opal
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560384
Core clock speed1552 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed1777 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data950 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate102.025.20
Floating-point processing power6.53 gflopsno data
ROPs408
TMUs7224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz4.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s36.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.56.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1 (1.2)
Vulkan1.21.2.170
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 35 Watt

RTX 3050 Mobile has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

R7 350 Fake Card, on the other hand, has 271.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and Radeon R7 350 Fake Card. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon R7 350 Fake Card is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
AMD Radeon R7 350 Fake Card
Radeon R7 350 Fake Card

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 4332 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 3 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 Fake Card on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.