Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB vs GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGA107GV10B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$899

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560512
Core clock speed735 MHz854 MHz
Boost clock speed1035 MHz1377 MHz
Number of transistors8,700 million9,000 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate82.8044.06
Floating-point processing power5.299 TFLOPS1.41 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8032
Tensor Cores8064
Ray Tracing Cores20no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
Lengthno data100 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/s136.5 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA8.67.2

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 30 Watt

RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q has a 50% more advanced lithography process.

Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q and Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q is a notebook card while Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB
Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 228 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.