Arctic Sound 1T vs GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGA107Arctic Sound
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20486144
Core clock speed712 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1057 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt350 Watt
Texture fill rate67.65172.8
Floating-point processing power4.329 TFLOPS11.06 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs64192
Tensor Cores64no data
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/s1.23 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 350 Watt

RTX 3050 Max-Q has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound 1T, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q and Arctic Sound 1T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q is a notebook card while Arctic Sound 1T is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q
Intel Arctic Sound 1T
Arctic Sound 1T

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 119 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound 1T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.