Radeon RX 6600 LE vs GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated181
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.56
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGA107Navi 23
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 July 2022 (3 years ago)8 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481792
Core clock speed622 MHz1626 MHz
Boost clock speed990 MHz2495 MHz
Number of transistorsno data11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt132 Watt
Texture fill rate63.36279.4
Floating-point processing power4.055 TFLOPS8.942 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs64112
Tensor Cores64no data
Ray Tracing Cores1628

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 July 2022 8 December 2023
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 132 Watt

RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB has 277.1% lower power consumption.

RX 6600 LE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB and Radeon RX 6600 LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6600 LE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB
AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE
Radeon RX 6600 LE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 38 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 29 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB or Radeon RX 6600 LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.