Playstation 5 Pro GPU vs GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking342not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.07no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA106Oberon Plus
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2024 (recently)7 November 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17923840
Core clock speed1065 MHz2800 MHz
Boost clock speed1343 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,000 million10,600 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate75.21672.0
Floating-point processing power4.813 TFLOPS21.5 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs56240
Tensor Cores56no data
Ray Tracing Cores14no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8no data
Lengthno data390 mm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)N/A
Shader Model6.7N/A
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 180 Watt

RTX 3050 A Mobile has 300% lower power consumption.

Playstation 5 Pro GPU, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile and Playstation 5 Pro GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile is a notebook card while Playstation 5 Pro GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile
AMD Playstation 5 Pro GPU
Playstation 5 Pro GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 5 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 41 vote

Rate Playstation 5 Pro GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.