Tesla T10 16 GB vs GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 173 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 14 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 64.10 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 17.15 | no data |
| Architecture | Ampere (2020−2024) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | GA106 | TU102 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 4 January 2022 (3 years ago) | 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 3072 |
| Core clock speed | 1552 MHz | 1065 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1777 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 12,000 million | 18,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 142.2 | 267.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 9.098 TFLOPS | 8.571 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 96 |
| TMUs | 80 | 192 |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | 384 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 48 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 242 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1575 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 403.2 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 8.6 | 7.5 |
| DLSS | + | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 150 Watt |
RTX 3050 8 GB has a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 15.4% lower power consumption.
Tesla T10 16 GB, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB and Tesla T10 16 GB. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB is a desktop card while Tesla T10 16 GB is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
